No.6255[View All]
Post cringy anti-fujos takes to laugh at or even discuss.
Old thread
>>4731 No.7860
>>7837>Oh, so a female serial killer appeared? They would say women are actually more cruel and sadistic than men and ignore how the other 99% of the demographic are not only way more male presentI know this isn't a feminism thread, but I will say this exact thing has driven me crazy before, especially when it's about women teachers who have sexually abused or assaulted boys or male students. Don't get me wrong, I think that stuff is fucked up, but there will be a handful of women teachers who do this, but then some men will use these examples for reasons why women on male sexual violence "is liturally just as common if not more!!!" This shit drives me insane. I know so many women and girls in my personal life who have been sexually abused before, but it's just so common place it doesn't feel like news to people.
No.7862
>>7859lmao they can hate and act like high school dipshits while giving misogynistic insults to a girl just cause their small poisoned zoom zoom brain thinks internet people say fujos bad, so fujos bad.
Zoomers are the worst thing that happened in fandom tbh.
Their illiterate ways of talking and their shitty unoriginal humor destroyed any meaningful dialogue people could have.
No.7866
>>7859"Fujoshis hate female characters" the antis say, and then they post massive misogynistic walls of text about female characters (that Fujos like, no less)…
No.7869
>>7867I'm shitting windows. I'm barfing macintosh.
No.7870
>>7869I'm puking MS DOS, I'm choking PC98.
No.7876
>>7866When you realize most of them are troons and hate 3d women but love their 2d waifus but because they're troons and call themselves lesbians this incel behavior gets acceptance.
No.7878
>>7859btw those are probably the same people that post their faces on tiktok with the "non-sharing yume" tag.
Zero self-awarenesses
No.7900
>>7764I tracked down the guy saying this. Turns out he means villainess isekai and girly girl romances with female protagonists. For a moment I was hopeful that there might have been some shift to pandering bonds between male leads.
No.8011
>>7456The irony of the top being so much more realistic than the bottom. It's a self-own meme.
>>7843Why should I de-center what I fetishise in fiction? Can't even consume media for pleasure?
No.8068
>>7456What game is "the average yaoi" screen shot from?
No.8070
>>7456paradise and other generic yaoi rapists are more interesting than moe blob schoolgirls
No.8112
>>8011>Can't even consume media for pleasure?Being straight/bi is centering men, nonna. Them's the rules.
No.8114
>>8113Watch ANY moe anime, problem solved.
No.8115
>>8113If these people cared they'd write their own F/F works. It's judt people who refuse to feed themselves.
No.8148
>>8147For shame, nona, didn't you know DRAMAtical Murder is actually a biopic? Absolutely disrespectful for fujos to fetishize Aoba Seragaki like that after everything he went through.
No.8150
>>8148Aoba groomed his dog, so that cosplayer is actually approving of electronic dog rape
No.8152
>>8147>cosplays a character from a bl game made for fujos and supported by fujos only>b-but i am not like the other girls thoualso
>hajimesboyfriend with pfp cosplaying as komaedaFujos should gatekeep all bl firstly, secondly how can you be a komahina shipper, one of the biggest videogame fujos ships of all time and be like 'yah but im not a fujo i just get horny pretending to be komaeda fucking hajime'
Self-hating has no limits huh
No.8159
>>8147I haven't seen the full tiktok but I did see that post and apparently the cosplayer was complaining about people sending them(??) her (??) porn. I don't know what porn it was but if it was CGs from the game, why are you complaining about porn while willingly cosplaying a character who
>gets nearly raped at the beginning of the game>can get double teamed by a snake and a lion (fake-pseudo bestiality)>gets decapitated>gets cuts all over his body and fucks while bleeding to death>also fucks a robot to death>fucks his brother who is inside his dog who is actually a tulpaLike, you at least have to know in some capacity that whenever you search his name high chance to find porn of him straight away
No.8162
>>8147A direct consequence of all things being seen just as an "aesthetic" to flex on Tiktok and not something you genuinely enjoy. We as fujos need to gatekeep harder.
>>8150KEK
No.8243
>>8242What are they even saying? What does "what is up with your active" mean? It makes no grammatical sense. And who or what is Carni.
No.8246
>>8243The user above the Aiden has an active Neopet named LadyFujoshi. Aiden whines that she hates the word fujoshi and says it's triggering.
No.8247
>>8246Oh man I only understand now how that forums works. No idea what neopets are (or not anymore), let alone that they're called "active" and that the text above isn't a post but a signature of the fujo"pet" user.
What a weird fucking forum and I am saying this as someone that uses forum since the late 90s.
Thanks. I wouldn't even answer to someone incapable of forming proper sentences. Especially not in a forum. What happened with the replying anyway? She will probably not even know that the other one talks to her since she isn't @ing.
No.8248
>>8247Neopets was my life as a terminally online child in the early 2000s. That and gaia online but it's been ages since I thought about those sites. I wonder how many children are on there at this point cause my impression was that they tend scroll tiktok now and they'd have no idea what a forum is. Though then again that aiden does have underaged energy.
No.8249
>>8248You would be surprised at how many 25+ people drank the koolaid unfortunately
No.8250
>>8248Vast majority of users are, unfortunately, full-on adults. I play it off and on, and it never ceases to amaze me how emotionally immature the players are.
No.8263
>>6255the take in this screenshot is baffling because the origins of fujoshi culture, as an olden japanese fudanshi, was built off of the back of women being some of the first vocal supporters of homosexual/transsexual rights both irl and in media. even today most fujoshis I've met have been more than abundantly supportive of LGBT rights (as well as a large chunk being lesbian/bisexual themselves).
the narrative that the fujo community doesn't care for the LGBT community is just so confusing. what do you think fujos are doing if not consuming homosexual media, some of which written by homosexual men. is that not indicative of support of homosexuals? the mind of an anti-fujo is very confusing. the very first uprises of "rotten girls" were women showing people like me their support in the face of a country that wanted to wipe our degeneracy from the public eye in order to promote the "safety of children".
while the concept of transsexuals is touchy (I personally lean towards supporting them, but much more towards actual transsexuals and not transgenders), I've noticed a much larger supporting overlap from the modern fujoshi subculture than ever before. in fact I've met dozens of transsexual fujos/fudans myself. the fujo subculture, and even the hime subculture, is vast and diverse. I feel as if these people have been fed tiktok brainrotted stereotypes about the subculture without ever indulging in its ideas or understanding where it comes from. or they're homophobic, there's always that too.
No.8279
>>8263Yeah. The issue is, what these people are thinking of when they talk about any sorts of rights are fictional characters. They apply real life standards onto fiction, which is why fujos seem unsupportive to them, because fujos (and actually most people) engage with media to have fun, not for apply moral standards onto them. People do (and should) do that in real life, not fiction. Liking a dictator from an anime isn't the same as condoning war crimes in real life.
No.8283
>>8263Antifujos have unironically always been homophobes. They’re just trying to rebrand themselves now that it isn’t cool to be homophobic. Anyone that claims fujos are anti-lgbt is retarded. Mainstream fujo spaces are quite literally filled with tifs to the point of cuntboy and troonwashing being considered yaoi stuff.
No.8358
ive noticed theres a lot of yuritards that started shipping het because “it at least has a woman in it” yet we’re the male obsessed ones
No.8379
>>8358They will call fujos male centric and then cheer on the removal of male characters from mixed gacha games as if that isn't what men want. They defend any decision that makes the most misogynistic man happy but fujos are male centric for not writing fanfic for them and enjoying fictional men.
No.8385
yap yap yap
Now post some pretty images of boys please
No.8387
>>8385Why are you in one of the rant threads if you don't want to read ranting lol
No.8389
>>8385>yapa younger zoomer or alphoid who can't read threads topics?
No.8395
>>8358Ahahaha. Where? This is hilarious.
>>8385Be the change you want to see.
No.8454
>>8453They always talk about how we degrade women but I've been a fujo for more than 16 years now and the number of times I saw other fujos do that can be counted on my fingers. Maybe what they mean by degradation is simply not shipping their beloved female character with a male one? Hell if I know
No.8457
>>8454No non-fujo ever believes me when I say this about a woman that "interferes" with my ships, but it pisses me off when the canon m/f in the media I'm into is so focused on the girl longing for the boy intensely and the boy never matching that intensity, only suddenly sparing her a thought at the end. My usual dislike of canon m/f is less about it getting in the way of my ship and more about it being embarrassing for the girl to put all of her love into a black hole. Girls IRL have so much of their time wasted like this so I hate seeing it in media when it's not on purpose and you're supposed to parse the dude as an asshole.
No.8458
>>8453Jokes on them my ship is canon
No.8460
>>8454Their "evidence" is always 14 year old girls making Relena Peacecraft hate shrines on Angelfire in 2002 or Sakura Haruno bashing (as if she wasn't also bashed by men and Naruto/Hinata shippers.) Or they think "ignoring" the love interest is on the same level as calling her a stupid cunt slut.
No.8461
>>8453The wildest thing about this take is they get so defensive on behalf of female characters written by men, and put all of their energy into hating the creations of other women. Then, they justify it under the guise of protecting women from fandom misogyny.
>>8454I think a lot of them project onto Sakura or other characters of that nature, so they take it as a personal insult if you don't want her to be with Sasuke. I feel like a lot of fujos end up "paring the spares" when it comes to canon love interests as opposed to degrading them, unless you're being incredibly uncharitable and looking at some 13-year-old's post about SasuNaru from over a decade ago.
>>8457>canon m/f in the media I'm into is so focused on the girl longing for the boy intensely and the boy never matching that intensityThis is a huge issue that I never see addressed. I like plenty of stories with female characters, and I have plenty of favorite characters who happen to be women. It's just that a lot of stories seem to revolve their female characters' arcs around finding love. All the female characters I like have a journey and identity outside of romance (and they're usually written by women, but that's another discussion entirely).
Also, why does whether we "like" or "hate" a female character tie directly to her romantic life, anyways? Why can't I like and admire characters outside of shipping? Do they put all of their favorite characters into ships? I have plenty of favorites - male and female - who I don't ship at all for a variety of reasons. It feels like they think romance is the ultimate fulfillment in life.