No.229
>>228I personally think a trap general wouldn't be a bad idea if it helps contain the women that like traps and simply wish to discuss them. But i wish the anti-trap anons kept their sperging to the anti-trap thread because it's very annoying to see it spill over elsewhere and I say this as someone that hates traps.
No.230
>>229> it's very annoying to see it spill over elsewhere and I say this as someone that hates traps.there's a rule about infighting, actually. if anti-trapfags start sperging about traps they should be banned for that
No.231
>>229>i wish the anti-trap anons kept their sperging to the anti-trap threadAs someone with no horse in this race whatsoever (I'm not into traps, but I also don't hate them with a burning passion or whatever), this is also all I want. Holy shit is it annoying seeing this lolcow tier fight spilling out all over the place. It's making me not want to visit the site at all anymore.
No.232
Sure let's keep banning stuff. Especially stuff that we perceive "mood-adjacent"
it will make this extremely lively site even more lively!
No.234
>>232kekkk fr
if we ban traps for being "moid-adjacent" we also need to ban shota, rape, most twinks, etc. bc men love all these things
No.235
>>234Also let's ban series my male authors too. Can't have our precious chan be filled with stuff written by men!!
Seriously, what's wrong with the people here.
No.236
>>235yup, may as well cross series like madk off the list of things we can talk about. don't wanna attract any men.
No.237
>>228we are not banning traps whatsoever, you can have a crossdressing/trap general thread in /ex/. it's fine and dandy to debate the ethicalness of it or whatever, but keep that to the anti-trap containment threads.
>>232>>234>>235>>236bold of you to assume anything before we've made a statement, we were discussing what to do about it considering the heat of the topic in the past few days. we strive to be a nice place for everyone here, and if you have any issues please come to us directly.
No.238
>>237So what does this actually mean? Is anything going to be done about the anti-trap schizos who can't stay in their damn containment threads? Because they're making this site borderline unusable with their "hurrdurr het with extra steps" rants.
No.239
>>238it means we'll take care of the containment breaching and tempban whenever it pops up, if there's any post we happen to miss just shoot us a report and we'll take care of it.
deeply sorry that we allowed it to get to this point, honestly as tired as can be from just looking over the infighting that came from this over the past few days and not knowing what to do about it, but i promise we're doing our best
No.241
>>237>bold of you to assume anything before we've made a statement, we were discussing what to do about it considering the heat of the topic in the past few days. we strive to be a nice place for everyone here, and if you have any issues please come to us directly.It's not like you are alien to schizo banning, see people who get banned for "acting like moids" or the ban of the N word.
No.245
>>241sorry for not being omnipresent and all-knowing, i guess? we can all make mistakes, even permabans are appealable, and i explained the reason for filtering the N-word elsewhere
again, if you have an issue with anything maybe talk to us directly like you are now, or even be on the lookout for mod apps when they open.
No.246
Honestly I feel like advertising the site as a place where males are banned on sight proved to be a bad move. Now you have people freely accusing each others of being male/having male tastes/supporting male fetishes every time there's an argument.
No.247
Not a part of this stupid debate but
>They're actually just flat women, because some women can have penises.
I doubt that's what they meant. You're probably being disingenuous on purpose.
99.99999% of trapshit is drawn by and for men. Or by women, but for men. Meaning that they are drawn *exactly* like anime girls, but given flat chests and a dick. They're not drawn in a way that appeals to women (except women who have memed themselves into liking male fetishes, I guess). Traps are not bishonen, they are bishojo but with dicks. Pointing this out is not the same as saying that males can be women in real life you goddamn retard.
Furthermore, allowing traps would only attract scrotes to the site.
No.248
>>247 (me)
Oh that's right, wasn't there a rule against bara or something like that? What happened to that anyway?
No.249
>>248no, there was never a rule against bara. we had a subsection for that but we killed it due to little activity
No.256
>>247>not part of this debate, but>*says literally every retarded point in the debate*Why are you people SO. INCREDIBLY. OBSESSED with males being here? Do you WANT men on the website? Seriously this is a place where there aren't any men and you say you DON'T want men but you can't seem to get them out of your head. Men like this thing, men will be attracted to this site, men enjoy this kind of thing, men men men men men men. You are the literal definition of rent-free.
No.257
Why is the trap thread locked?
No.258
>>257I guess it's considered an extreme kink so mods moved it to /ex/.
No.264
>>260we'd come to an agreement that trap/femboy pics do not quite match up with the general tone of any other board, so there it stays. it's not a specific fandom, it's not bl exclusive, and, mind you, it was initially made in /ffs/ of all places, which is extremely ot.
No.272
>>264can it just be moved to /bl/ with the focus being male on male works? it seems dumb that the trap likers here have to scroll through gore because of schizos chimping out at things they don't like being posted.
i mean i hate quite a few things being discussed on this site atm (genshin impact, vtubers, etc.) but i've not made a single complaint regarding them bc i'm not retarded and know how to hide threads and posts. punish them, not us.
No.274
>>272ok so, i went ahead and made a thread ^__^. i ask that it's given like, a month (i say a month because this site is terribly slow and dead, a week wouldn't prove anything) and if it ends up blowing everything up, then sure, delete it.
but i would like to say there's a yuri thread on /ot/ right now (a thread i've posted in a few times) and it hasn't had the site been burned down by moids soo. yeah. lmao. maybe show some fairness to the people (myself especially) that actually do more on this site than bitch about things they hate being posted.
No.275
>>228Traps arent yaoi they are shounen. They should be posted in /ot/. The only thing yaoi about traps is that its gay but thats it. No idea why trap lovers can't keep their threads on 4chan where they are welcomed and not here on a yaoi site. It doesn't matter whether women like traps or not.
No.276
https://fujochan.org/bl/res/179.htmlI don't get why was this thread locked?
Feminine uke=/=traps
OP example of a feminine uke is Kenma from HQ who is definitely not a trap.
No.277
>>276Given the mod comment on the thread it seems it was locked due to the antitrap spergs shitposting in it. Which…seems really dumb? Looking over the old posts in that thread, disagreements were civil and actual discussions were happening. Mods, you're really choosing to punish everyone because schizos can't stay in their own containment threads?
No.278
>>276There's nothing feminine about Kenma, he's just short and has long hair.
No.280
>>277nearly every poster in the thread linked by
>>276 is currently posting (or has posted) in the /ffs/ thread; it was inevitably going to become sperg fest #2.
if you want to discuss feminine ukes, there's a crossdressing general currently up on /bl/. (though, its existence is being debated by the mod team.)
No.281
>>272Genshin Impact and Vtubers have a sizable m/m shipping and yume audience and their threads are in that context, traps have literally nothing to do with BL. It's like complaining about not having a lolicon thread just because "some women like loli!!!!!!!" despite it being universally a male-aligned genre and many fujos and yumes being repulsed by it.
No.282
>>280Feminine ukes are not the same as crossdressers or traps, what even is this? I hate traps and crossdressing is cringe but love feminine ukes, it's ridiculous to imply that a cute, effeminate male character in female works is the same as a fullblown crossdresser.
(you only needed to reply once. also: ban evasion.) No.283
>>280>if you want to discuss feminine ukes, there's a crossdressing general currently up on /bl/. (though, its existence is being debated by the mod team.)That's the point though? Feminine uke are not crossdressers, I don't want to discuss crossdresser. Kenma from HQ never crossdresser, he's just a not manly looking boy.
Like Masculine Seme/Feminine uke is the most archetypal BL pairing ever.
I don't see the point of locking the thread anyway, it's not like we are starved for space.
No.286
>>283we're attempting to keep complaineranons corralled on /ffs/. please reread the post you're replying to, and understand the thread you're asking after saw no activity for three entire months until one of the posters from /ffs/ chose to enter it and…complain. sorry.
you're welcome to start a "feminine ukes general" if you don't feel feminine ukes are included in the "etc." of the crossdressing op, or in any other general on /bl/.