>>378Different anon. At risk of sounding like a schizo, I feel like generally gay men have some physical characteristics that you can note. I'm not saying 100% of the time or anything, just as a general rule. Their skin is softer than regular moid and they tend to collect more weight around the hips/lower back. Slightly different gait even when they're not doing some exaggerated feminine walk. Some facial characteristics too. Even in the more traditionally masculine, higher testosterone looking men. You can't really diagnose a guy based on these things, but if you get a sense of these characteristics, and you see a gay guy with them, it's like "oh, yea, there it is". But I don't have any science to back it up so feel free to dismiss this.
>>379>the non-gay energy makes the idea of them being together better.Lmao well said. I like this too. It's why the "gay for you" trope is usually pretty decent for me. Although honestly while I'm not into shipping effeminate, camp gay guys, they can't be regular old dudebro moid imbeciles either. What's their bromance date gonna look like. Farting to the football match? Ugh.