[ Home ] [ All ] [ bl / f / flf ] [ ex ] [ oc ] [ ffs / ot / site ] [ wes / rps ] [ RULES ]

/ffs/ - Fujo Fandom Sperging

Name
Options
Subject
Comment
File
:
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1732707855504.png (165.07 KB, 300x300, ClipboardImage.png)ImgOps Google iqdbYandex

 No.5838

So this has been confirmed by all my Chinese mutuals, who have told me how hopeless things have become there and it's only getting worse. In 2014 obscenity laws were passed in China that mainly targeted mainstream porn sites, but gay content was also included and targeted, forcing Chinese BL authors to use more 'flowery language' if they were writing something intended for an 'audience' in public, but on foreign sites (Western but mostly Taiwanese) they could be more free, still it was gradually building up to this, starting from 2022(according to my mutuals) the underground sites were removed en-masse, now the Chinese government even forces foreign companies to meet their standards. If you are a Chinese citizen who even writes anything about gay romance, you will go to jail for it

Here's the article for more information
https://www.whatsonweibo.com/the-price-of-writing-smut-inside-chinas-crackdown-on-erotic-fiction/

 No.5839

because Xinnie the pooh needs population growth

 No.5841

Being a Chinese fujo sounds like hell on earth.

 No.5844

Unfortunately there isn't much they can do, I used to live in an authoritarian shithole and when the government got serious about dealing with any kind of anti-state groups, they basically censored the entire internet, at best you could get a VPN for YouTube, but that's about it and most governments have the power to do this if they wanted to

 No.5845

>>5839
I truly don't believe China has 1.1 billion people. I actually believe in the "China actually has 500 million" conspiracy. That's why he's in full panic mode, plus all the dead unborn/infant girls the Chinese stupidly had killed.

 No.5846

>>5845
They deserve every problem that befalls them for what they did to all those girls. My only wish is for innocent Chinese women and girls to find a way out.

 No.5890

China is a country of institutional misogyny, so of course women can't be allowed their own cultural sphere or 'wasteful interests'. Then a surprise Pikachu face when the cattle reject participating in the society! Serves the old male fucks at the Politburo right.
>One afternoon in the spring of 1997, as my seven-year-old classmate and I played in a tiny park in our Shanghai neighbourhood, she shared a secret: “I’m allowed to have a little brother or sister.” My jaw dropped. No one my age had a sibling except a pair of twins at school. People used the words “sister” and “brother” to mean cousin. Having siblings was an outlandish, outdated, even shameful concept, something older generations had done before the one-child policy was introduced in 1980.
>My parents carefully stored our One Child Honorary Certificate, with golden characters on a sleek red booklet, in a bottom drawer, right by my birth certificate. They were good citizens who, by definition, had only one child.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2024/nov/27/a-moment-that-changed-me-at-seven-i-saw-the-truth-of-chinas-one-child-policy-and-felt-my-parents-pain

 No.5892

>>5841
Best option would probably be fleeing to Taiwan, many Chinese artists have already done that

 No.5893

>The post came from a user named “Rain Painted on a Sunny Day” (@晴天画的雨), the younger sister of the Haitang author known as “Yunjian” (云间, “Between the Clouds”). On October 16, she revealed that Yunjian had been detained since June 20 and is only allowed visits from her lawyer. The arrest notice she shared cites the charge: “suspected of producing and disseminating pornographic materials for profit” (“传播淫秽物品牟利罪”).
>Recent cases indicate similar outcomes: on October 17, a Weibo account called @HuaiBeiLiXinWrongfulCase (@淮北李鑫冤案) posted a plea, revealing that author Li Xin (李鑫), who co-wrote the historical fantasy Six Dynasties with Luo Sen (罗森), was detained on the same charge after earning 300,000 yuan ($42,118) in royalties, which led to a ten-year prison sentence. As a similarly prominent author, Yunjian may face even harsher penalties and potentially an even longer prison term.
what the fuck, this is so fucking terrifying to me

 No.5895

>>5892
>many Chinese artists have already done that
That's legally not possible though. You can move to Taiwan if you're a HK resident, but if you are a Chinese citizen, you're screwed.

 No.5906

>>5844
this just makes me worry about my mutuals with in third world countries, because yeah if an authoritarian government takes over they would obviously remove the fun parts of the internet in the name of morality, while also committing an irl genocide

 No.5907

>>5892
>>5895
>>5906
Do chinese enjoy living through these 543534 rules?

 No.5915

>>5907
not like they can complain

 No.5917


 No.5929

>>5906
America can do this too, just watch.

 No.5935

>>5929
I'm afraid of that too. If there is a ban on porn and erotica, we are screwed. Again, there's not much we can do if a government wants to ban it. If that happens, the only option is to self-publish IRL with zines

 No.5936

>>5929
>>5935
They won't don't upset yourself over something that isn'tgoing to happen, America's whole thing is freedom of speech which is why literally every website no matter where they are actually from is hosted there. The ammount of time and legislation required to get something passed would be a huge undertaking and it would die in office. What you actually need to be worried about is the fact that credit card providers like VISA have websites by the balls and don't want to provide support yo people selling 18+ products.

 No.5937

>>5929
I said this since facebook blew up but I say it even louder now, we need some sort of parallel internet for nerds that the corps won't give a shit about. I know it wouldn't work but still. The old internet was great because it was too niche for corps, politicians and male and female karens to give a shit.
There is a reason for why many use discords and anon boards, because they're less regulated I want some sort of darknet but for hobby shit and interests instead of crime only.
>>5935
That would legit doom everybody who isn't Japanese or US American. Fandoms aren't big enough in other countries, I legit never encountered another German in ANY of the fandoms I ever frequented and I am active since 2007. I legit wouldn't wonder if there wasn't a single other fan in my whole state even for the bigger fandoms I am part of.

 No.5938

>>5936
have you forgotten what's happened?

 No.5941

File: 1732889768478.jpg (893.47 KB, 1414x2000, b8590e23b573f86c559798803e….jpg)ImgOps Exif Google iqdbYandex

>>5938
Are you talking about RvW? That's an example of something that was bouncing around Congress and had a clear party opposition for years. It's also a much more divisive issue than porn, which neither party has a strong concentrated opposition to, despite people on both sides disliking it. RvW was also just an overturning of a previous ruling as opposed to a new law on the books. Doomerism is lame, and I'm sorry, but getting upset about something that presently is not happening and has no signs of happening is pointless, and there are better uses of your time. Again, the closest thing is credit card providers and some laws that want to force websites to require sign-ins if they host 18+ content, but none of those are widespread bans like China.

China has banned pornography since the 80s, and this is something that is already on the books and which is just now being enforced. It sucks, and I think it has a lot of collateral damage, but it's also a completely different political landscape from the rest of the world.

This is edging dangerously close to politics which I don't want to talk about, but for the foreseeable future just know that for now gay Chinese men are safe on most of the internet.

 No.5949

>>5941
NTA, yeah, i'd add that the pros of banning porn vastly outweight the cons of banning written/2D smut in its stride, as annoying as it may be. Let's hope they make a distinction between porn and BL, but i'm not hopeful.

 No.5954

>>5949
I was referring to project 2025, which specifically lists banning pornography as one of its core tenets, but with a special focus on anything remotely same-sex related, We've already seen a few states pass laws requiring video sites to adopt age verification, prompting pornhub and others to block users in those states rather than comply and If lawmakers include erotica and drawn works, we'd see similar restrictions, the best case scenario for us in this just results in requiring proof of adulthood, which would basically force you to give your actual information to prove your an adult if you want to read anything, worst case is a total ban, making it outright illegal to host and share anything considered "deviant"

 No.5955

>>5954
I don't want to huff copium but I don't think our government is competent enough to do something like ban pornography all together or even require age verification nationwide. At least I hope not. Wouldn't this go against the First Amendment anyways?

 No.5958

>>5955
NTA but no way will they ever extend the ban to actual porn, they'll just target any content with same sex relations (romantic or sexual) and ban it under these new obscenity laws. Just like China.

 No.5961

>>5955
sis, if my former third world country(mayanmar) was able to basically ban two-thirds of the whole internet when it was going through a civil war, I think the US is more than competent enough to do something like banning pornography

 No.5962

>>5961
Likely not since state governments are way too independent to get federal control on; something that goes against freedom of speech would be incredibly difficult to mandate (Tiktok was supposed to be banned countrywide but loss the 34 out of 50 vote for it)

 No.5963

>>5936
>America says freedom of speech so it will never happen
The people in power have always been freedom of speech for some, not all. Even other Western countries ban 2d porn and consider loli/shota equivalent to CP. It would be hard to affect nationwide but I could see some states having laws like that. Some states already require an ID to watch porn.

 No.5965

>>5963
You actually don't need any kinds of laws to effectively ban porn. The credit card companies can do it with zero government input.

 No.5972

>>5954
Why do they even bother? Even dumb phoneposters know how to use a VPN.

>>5965
>with zero government input
…that can be easily traced. They don't do this out of their own sense of morality.

 No.5988

>>5958
>NTA but no way will they ever extend the ban to actual porn, they'll just target any content with same sex relations (romantic or sexual) and ban it under these new obscenity laws. Just like China.

That's why I don't get those homophobic fujos tbh.

 No.6007

>>5954
Honestly I want to believe that nothing will happen but if the last four year shave showed me one thing it's that nothing is too fucking terrible to not happen out of nowhere out of the blue and that there is absolutely nothing any normal person can do about it. Most dictatorships and fascist countries were open and a million times better at some point before some nutcases got to power and got backed by other nutcases from other countries.

The advantage of 2D shit is that it's very niche and rarely on the radar of despots. I am sure if my country would ban porn they would never even think of 2D gay because they aren't even aware if its existence, they barely even know what a fandom is (and most older people have never heard that word).

But for the US I am not sure. The anime community is massive there and actually mainstream. I don't think it will happen (for now) but I said this for a lot of things that happened in the last years before they actually happened, so I lost my faith.

 No.6083

from LC
>Hong Kong Cinema's Self-Censorship Era: Veteran Director Johnnie To Breaks Silence in Landmark Interview

>In a powerful and revealing interview with BBC News Cantonese, Johnnie To (杜琪峯), one of Hong Kong's most celebrated filmmakers and a director who has earned international acclaim including recognition at Cannes, Venice, and Berlin film festivals, has offered an unprecedented glimpse into Hong Kong's changing cultural landscape and the realities of filmmaking under increasing constraints.


>The veteran filmmaker, whose illustrious career spans over four decades and includes critical successes like "Election," "Breaking News," and "Drug War," finds himself at what he describes as "the lowest point in my life" ("最近都是我人生最低潮的時候"). Having built a reputation for exploring themes of friendship, fate, and Hong Kong's evolving society, Johnnie To now faces profound creative challenges.


>He spoke candidly about the loss of artistic freedom: "I feel there's no soul now, including both myself and Hong Kong" ("我覺得現在沒有靈魂,包括我和香港都沒有了"). This crisis, he emphasized, stems from the erosion of "human rights and freedom" ("人權和自由").


>When asked about topics filmmakers must avoid, Johnnie To responded with characteristic sharp insight: "You know what? It's strange that you're asking me this," ("你知道的,你問我很奇怪") he remarked, before laying bare the reality of self-censorship: "Why needlessly create confrontation? If you don't want to touch that red line, if you don't want to raise suspicions… then don't say too much about Hong Kong affairs" ("無謂直接去衝撞,你不想碰到那條紅線,或者你不想有些被懷疑的話,你就不要說那麼多,關於香港的事").


>His advice was particularly telling: "Don't talk too much regarding Hong Kong's current political situation - just make more romance films, family dramas instead" ("你就不要說太多,關於香港現在政治上的事,你就多說些愛情,說些親情").


>Johnnie To offered pointed criticism of current governance approaches: "A government with confidence wouldn't do this. They have no confidence in the people, no confidence in society" ("有信心的政府會這樣嗎?對人沒有信心,對人民沒有信心,對社會沒有信心"). He dismissed official displays of prosperity as superficial, stating "Setting off fireworks pretending Hong Kong is prosperous - who are you trying to fool? Even grandma won't be fooled" ("放下煙花當香港很繁榮,你騙誰啊,婆婆都騙不了").


>Johnnie To reflected on Hong Kong's transition: "In the 80s we talked about it, in the 90s we knew return to China was inevitable. What determined our future way of life? The Basic Law. I believed in the Basic Law," after a pause, he added with notable emphasis, "I still believe in the original one" ("我覺得,我相信基本法,現在還相信,原來那個").

1/2

 No.6084

>>6083
>Despite opportunities to work overseas, the renowned director maintains an unwavering commitment to Hong Kong cinema: "I stick to filming in Hong Kong - how can I go elsewhere when I can't even fully grasp my own culture?" ("我連香港自己成長的地方的文化,我都捉得不夠準,我怎會去別的地方學別人的東西"). This dedication comes at a personal cost, as he reveals: "I keep writing and throwing away scripts - I don't even know how many I've discarded" ("變成想完一次又扔掉,想完一次又扔掉,都不知道扔了多少東西").

>The founder of independent production house Milkyway Image (銀河映像) in 1996 described his current creative paralysis: "I used to be very confident about my film concepts, but in recent years I've had many doubts" ("我以前對構思上,對電影的信心很強,這幾年會覺得有很多懷疑"). He distinguished his current struggles from past challenges, noting "My crisis isn't about money - I haven't lost my ideals due to poverty before, but now I've lost them" ("以前沒有錢,不是代表沒有了我的理想,現在是沒有了").


>Johnnie To, who has served on juries at all three major international film festivals - Cannes, Venice, and Berlin, used a striking metaphor to describe the industry's current state: "How can you fight against an elephant's foot when you're just an ant? If it steps on you, you're dead" ("你怎樣能夠頂得住一隻大象的腳,你只有一隻矮的時候,踩中必死").


>The interview comes at a critical juncture for Hong Kong cinema, as the industry grapples with new film censorship regulations and changing political dynamics. As a filmmaker known for his ability to work across genres and his distinctive style mixing realism with highly stylized elements, Johnnie To's current creative paralysis speaks to broader issues facing Hong Kong's cultural sector. "In terms of industry and art, this is not a good era" ("在工業上也好,藝術上也好,各方面都不是一個好的時代"), he observed.


>While the struggles he describes are well-known within Hong Kong's film industry, Johnnie To's willingness to speak openly about these challenges makes him one of the most prominent figures to publicly address the creative constraints facing Hong Kong filmmakers today. His candid revelations carry particular weight given his stature in both local and international cinema.


Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvqZc7S9D24
https://www.reddit.com/r/HongKong/comments/1ghxznh/hong_kong_cinemas_selfcensorship_era_veteran/
2/2

 No.6168

>>6084
Hong Kong cinema used to be the best in Asia, but commies must ruin everything they touch. Fuck that death cult.

 No.6174

>>6168
Death cult?

 No.6175

>>6174
Implementation of communism always leaves piles of bodies behind.

 No.6267

>>6175
but why do wokies support it?

 No.6269

File: 1733914205007.jpg (342.28 KB, 1738x2048, 854d4b674f8980868a134cb8b6….jpg)ImgOps Exif Google iqdbYandex

I wonder if this means there will be less Chinese fanworks on Ao3, it is by far the "foreign language" I see most on there.

>>6267
>>6175
Can we keep the discussion focused on the actual fan impact not the general politics?

 No.6270

File: 1733918091279-0.jpg (148.88 KB, 976x367, Clipboard01.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google iqdbYandex

File: 1733918091279-1.jpg (119.14 KB, 605x347, Clipboard02.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google iqdbYandex

File: 1733918091279-2.jpg (165.42 KB, 595x439, Clipboard03.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google iqdbYandex

File: 1733918091279-3.jpg (83.06 KB, 814x342, Clipboard04.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google iqdbYandex

>>6269
>Can we keep the discussion focused on the actual fan impact not the general politics?
This entire topic is political, so I don't know how you even could. China cracking down on fujo stems directly from their communism, not 'traditional Han values' as historically nobody cared if men had homo sex as long as they fulfilled their duty of fathering children.
https://thechinaproject.com/2023/10/05/how-censorship-changed-the-landscape-of-chinas-queer-audio-dramas/
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/13678779231159424

>I wonder if this means there will be less Chinese fanworks on Ao3, it is by far the "foreign language" I see most on there.

There will be more, because the fujo mind cannot be cured. Not even crackdowns on VPNs will prevent fujo.
https://uschinatoday.org/features/2020/08/31/negotiating-queer-fantasy-and-the-normative-boys-love-stories-fandom-in-china/

 No.6271

BTW, Fujochan is not blocked in China (tested with https://www.chinafirewalltest.com), so you can invite any Chinese fujo to make threads and post here in Chinese (posting in foreign languages is not against the rules).

 No.6272

File: 1733921188843.png (3.62 MB, 1500x1000, ClipboardImage.png)ImgOps Google iqdbYandex

>>6270
>China cracking down on fujo stems directly from their communism, not 'traditional Han values
This, Taiwan has way more traditional Han culture then modern-day China and they have a thriving gay scene and BL airs on mainstream television. The problem with China is that its leaders are ideologically driven and because it is an authoritarian country they can implement those ideas
>https://uschinatoday.org/features/2020/08/31/negotiating-queer-fantasy-and-the-normative-boys-love-stories-fandom-in-china/
this article is from 2020, long before China actually started seriously banning bl and erotica, i'm really sad to say, but it's actually over for them, no one wants to risk a fine or jail time

 No.6981

this is why I hate naive wokies who thinks China is full of gender acceptance, feminism, and racial equality but was colonised by ebil whites and forced white supremacist ideals, typical American oppression Olympics content

 No.7271

File: 1739038415398.png (1.01 MB, 999x832, ClipboardImage.png)ImgOps Google iqdbYandex

Well shit

 No.7273

>>7271
Oh my fucking god, watch how the Chinese system will be copied not just by Russia but a bunch of other idiotic governments. Almost every western country is already ruled by a far-right party anyway and all of them believe globalism is bad and their own country the best that should stay untainted by foreign cultures. No surprise that Russia attempts to pull that too

 No.7282

>>7273
I feel like this is the beginning of the end, those of us in the West may have some freedom (for now at least) but that's ending. It's over

 No.7506

File: 1739935565889.png (791.28 KB, 960x540, ClipboardImage.png)ImgOps Google iqdbYandex

There was this Russian feminist artist who was literally arrested by the state for "creating pornography" with art like this, she was going to be sentenced to six years in a russian prison, now Russian prison(even a women's prison) are beyond awful from what I've read, she only managed to be acquitted thanks to some international pressure but after that, this woman who was a prominent Theater Director basically choose to disappear, not working anything that could ever "offend" the goverment and she probably is going to live the rest of her life in fear for what might happen, this is the case for everyone in these authoritarian states and it's only getting worse
https://crd.org/2020/03/10/russian-feminist-activist-and-artist-risks-six-years-in-prison-over-social-media-posts/

 No.7565

>>7506
This is exactly what these "porn bans" are made for. They're NEVER made for banning material exploiting women and doing sexual violence to them because men in power would not be caught dead doing that, instead they're ALWAYS meant for banning portrayals of LGBT lives. A story depicting a same sex relationship can be banned under obscenity laws even if it's completely safe for work and wholesome because homosexuality is considered inherently sexually degenerate, the simple implication of these two people possibly being sexually involved is enough to be classified as "pornography". I feel like ripping my hair out every time I see retards on lolcow calling porn bans based because they're fucking not what they seem to be.

 No.7570

>>7565
And women are disproportionally are the victims in those bans too. Those fucking retards keep saying "BASED" but the ones getting the brunt end of the policing is rarely men. No matter how much you tell them this, they will never understand because the antiporn has rotted their brain's critical thinking center. Horseshoe theory is real

 No.7577

>>7565
>>7570
I've actually come to side with the libfems, all Marxists and Radfems willingly support brutal dictators and call countries like China based, sending porn artists to labour camps is bad actually

 No.7578

>>7577
Same. I hate that I have to choose the side that wants to brainwash young girls with body-destroying gendie ideology but clearly the other side is much worse for women. There's so many talented chinese and russian fujoshi out there who deserve to thrive from the work they do instead of being treated like criminals.

 No.7579

>>7578
Yeah, think about all the obscene moid coomery hailing from China with its numerous gacha games that are straight up porn made for men yet they always go unpunished. Meanwhile women writing danmei or m/m doujinshis can and have faced prison time, and they're up against both unhinged yumes and misogynist men who want them out.

>>7577
>>7578
The lolcow bubble's brainrot about the "libfem" boogeymen is actual moronic stupidity. Being a feminist isn't a binary of either "based radfem" or "cucked libfem", most feminists don't identify with either but simply just as feminists. There's a lot of nuance between them, the overwhelming majority have common sense and think shit like reckless gender affirming care for minors is actual madness but think troons are fine as long as they're not being overtly obnoxious about it like some crazed AGP degenerates.

 No.7580

>>7579
God, I hate how these radfems pretend to care about women but then proceed to support bills harming their rights to creativity. Say what you will about porn but hampering down on sexuality is anti-human.

 No.7582

>>7580
It's why the radfem to tradfem pipeline is a real thing. A lot of them are extremely conservative in their views but try to frame it as a feminist stride. Even the "radfem" take on fujoism is usually "it leads to young women developing pornsickness and transitioning to men" because of their satanic panic level disgust of sexuality (and their denial of it), usually much more fervently expressed at other women rather than men who are actually so ruined by porn that their choking fetishes exist in the regular mainstream discourse and not just chronically online fandom spaces.

 No.7583

girls, most radfems arent against erotica as a whole, just the exploitation of women that happens in prostitution and in the porn industry, hence why being "anti-porn" is a core point of their ideology.
another point they bring up is how the hypersexualization of females leads to multiple negative consequences for women in society.

these are all very real issues and i dont think they're wrong in pointing them out.
some radfems might have a more general aversion to porn and extend it to fujo content but that's usually an issue of the individual rather than something intrinsic to radical feminism.
i want to believe they're mostly gloating about the impact on scrotes, and are ignorantly unaware of how it hurts undeserving women artists too.

 No.7584

>>7583
>most radfems arent against erotica as a whole, just the exploitation of women that happens in prostitution and in the porn industry, hence why being "anti-porn" is a core point of their ideology.
Most feminists are like this, you don't have to be a "radfem" to recognize how harmful porn is. The extreme black and white thinking, obsession with ideological purity and egoistical take on the "radfem-libfem" binary is a one sided rivalry a lot of radfem influencers constantly feed into and then they dip and at some point they either come out as crunchy hippies into shit like antivaxxing and peddling snake oil to their followers OR turn into tradfems after getting married to a catholic Nigel and start preaching against gay people. The "pro-porn" stance a lot of "libfems" (i.e. any feminist who doesn't want to kill troons as specified by the rad-lib dichotomy) carry is that they want to support sex workers and their human rights, not enable scrotes to look at violent porn. The tide on issues like OF has really shifted and the "woman has sex with 100 men over 24 hours for clout and has a mental breakdown" thing peaked even the most dense heads.

See, I agree with a ton of radfem ideas. Most of them, in fact. I would classify myself as a radical feminist. But the online radfem spaces are infested with conservative fucks who twist these ideas into serving conservative causes. Radfems grew a big head about how "stupid" these "libfems" are for allowing troons to infiltrate their ranks but are completely blind how they did the exact same but with conservative right wingers. A sieve mocks the colander for having holes.

 No.7585

>>7584
i agree, but a lot of radfems or radfem-leaning women ive interacted with, including you, are not like how you're describing and are pretty sound women with good points.

i dislike aspects of both radical feminism and liberal feminism, and agree with points from both, but saying that libfems have the same awareness of the dangers of specific types of pornography on women and society as a whole hasn't been true at all in my experience.
they don't just want rights for women who work in the sex industry, which is a very fair point - the majority of them think that being in porn, prostitution, and perpetrating stereotypes and behaviors that keep women in submissive and snickered at position in society is ~empowering~, and this is far from the only issue in their beliefs.

you're totally right that some radfems use the anti-porn and anti-trans stance of radical feminism to hide their far-right nature. however, i do believe these women are not even feminists to begin with, let alone radical. it's just a hip way for them to perpetrate their bullshit while appearing quirkier than a tradwife.

 No.7588

>>7585
nayrt but I feel like that brand of "everything is empowering! never question anything that makes you horny!" liberal feminism has gotten a lot less popular and rhetorically weaker in recent years. it's not social justice tumblr years anymore. i think we ARE witnessing an overcorrection though. criticizing pornography (including 2d hentai, plenty of misogynistic tropes there too) is important, but i feel like even a lot of radfems do it pretty sloppily when they try to go beyond the obvious exploitation argument. i've seen enough fruitless debates on whether fujo radfems count as REAL radfems or not to realize that. in a way, it feels like a significant amount of radfems would rather write off women with strange sexual proclivities as lost causes instead of encouraging them to be more introspective. i still remember coming across a radblr blog who treated m/m whump fic like it was some extreme, incomprehensible taboo lol. it's true that a lot of women develop kinks that are heavily interlinked with misogyny and their own oppression, but i don't think online radfem communities as they are now are equipped to really do much to help those women and girls beyond dropping the usual quips.

with that being said, the porn lobby is powerful. i do feel like any porn ban would overwhelmingly affect independent, non-exploitative erotica by and for women and lgbt before even scratching anything owned by mindgeek.

 No.7592

>>7582
>it leads to young women developing pornsickness and transitioning to men
Kek, do they really? I can understand too much is bad but can't for the life of me compare a women who reads 2d erotica once a month to a man who spends most of his days gooning to women getting choked to death. To make things more ironic They're probably the ones that certainly shlicking to yume art kek.

 No.7594

>>7592
No really, that's a super common sentiment among them, especially radblr. I remember that one middle aged radfem who even made a fucking video about the topic.
>They're probably the ones that certainly shlicking to yume art kek.
Oh, you bet. The Lolcow radfem variety in particular absolutely hates fujos and has multiple threads dedicated to complaining about how fujos are misogynists cucked into trooning out for frying their brains with gay porn while they themselves goon to Otome Game #453435 and its abusive main love interest Rapey McCageman.

 No.7603

>>7579
>Yeah, think about all the obscene moid coomery hailing from China with its numerous gacha games that are straight up porn made for men yet they always go unpunished
tbf a Chinese porn artist (gore, child rape) was sent to a literal labor camp for the next 10 years of his life, and the entire Chinese internet celebrated it

 No.7606

>>7603
Yeah men have to draw mauled children being raped in order to be punished while women can just draw two normal men kissing and get their asses detained.

 No.7637

>>7594
I do like hetshit but hetshitters pretending their hetslop is super feminist aren't doing feminism any favors. If they said they simply wanted more het ships in fanart they could've gone with that. But instead, they rather self-flagellate over ebil fujos turning their husbands into shit eating faggots.
not my fault that most canon het ships are garbage.
> I remember that one middle aged radfem who even made a fucking video about the topic.
I forgot her name but everything about that vid felt so painfully wrong that you can't help but feel sorry for her. She's old and might've never engaged with fandom culture until you realize fandom stuff went way way back way before I was born.
>>7606
It's making me ever more scared if trump might do the same for us Americans? I wouldn't put it past him given the cult he amass that hates anything anti-white, male, and straight.

 No.7643

>>7637
>It's making me ever more scared if trump might do the same for us Americans?
I agree this sucks, but if we act like SJWs who set unrealistic goals, it will lead to us not being taken seriously. The most likely path is that porn and erotica will be banned, but anything to do with "LGBT" will be dealt with more severely and you can be fined for hosting "porn" sites. But we'll undoubtedly be seeingg free speech activists protesting this, which is the side we might end up having to side with, for better or for worse

 No.7704

>>7643
TFW I recall siding with free speech activism in the first damn place as an OG fujo in the early 2000's

 No.7705

>>7643
I don't mind certain types of porn getting banned. Lord knows numerous exploited kinkslop pervading these sites but I also believe we should go all or nothing on the topic of human sexuality. It's a constant for most of us and seeing so many countries scrutinize those outside the norm fills me with such rage that can't tamed. I hate it here.
And you know what's fucked? some "radfems" are complacent with this while their ssa sisters are getting dragged in the streets all over trannies turning the kids "gay".



[Return][Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home ] [ All ] [ bl / f / flf ] [ ex ] [ oc ] [ ffs / ot / site ] [ wes / rps ] [ RULES ]