No.1543
>What do you generally think of such shipping? Do you think it's dumb, annoying, interesting, fun?
I think it's cute/funny in fanart but otherwise I don't care much for it. It's not something I seek out. However it can become sort of annoying and lose it's cuteness/funny appeal when people start spamming it because of "le epic memes".
>Any thoughts on serious crossovers style ships of two characters different properties vs joke ships trying to be silly, what is your preference?
I avoid crossover ships because I just find it too silly but I have nothing against the concept. Also if people are going to ship it then they should at least commit and do it because they genuinely find the pairing interesting
>Do you have any crack pairings you like?
I have some rarepairs that some would consider crack because the characters barely interact. I just think they look good together and/or their personalities clash perfectly
>Do you think it has any effect on fandom as a whole, either positeve or negative?
Not really. It's easy to avoid if you don't want to see it.
>Did you ever start to ship something as a joke, to then become unironic about the pairing?
Yes. Mostly in Hetalia just because the characters are so shipable so I just think "lol they would be a fun couple" and then I realise that they would indeed make a fun couple. But Hetalia is the only fandom where I have done this.
No.1566
>What do you generally think of such shipping? Do you think it's dumb, annoying, interesting, fun?
I think that crack ships are a great fun and can lead to creative things
>Any thoughts on serious crossovers style ships of two characters different properties vs joke ships trying to be silly, what is your preference?
Both can be good but more serious stuff needs to have a good execution and dynamic for me to genuinely like it
>>Do you have any crack pairings you like?
A few, I like shipping protagonists and main villains from different show seasons/game iterations/etc.
>>Do you think it has any effect on fandom as a whole, either positive or negative?
Maybe they can make a fandom look a little bit more lolsorandumbXD but in the end they usually are harmless jokes or attempts to give a character a ship with a more satisfying to the author/artist chemistry than what more conventional and logical choices can give
Shipping is a silly thing in the first place, it can only get so much sillier with the crossover ships
On the other hand they can give interesting and memey results that even people outside of the fandoms can enjoy or help the shipper in their creative endeavors in producing their original content
>>Did you ever start to ship something as a joke, to then become unironic about the pairing?
Yes, namely KiraxDiavolo from Jojo's Bizarre Adventure. It eventually just grew on me
Jojo in general is rich with crack ship potential, same with Naruto
No.1619
My first m/m pairing was a literal crackship between dipper from gravity falls and wirt from over the garden wall. I have no idea why I liked the idea of them together so much, but it made me happy. I think crackships are a good thing for fandoms because they keep fandoms less serious and more fun. I also think they allow people to explore creative dynamics.
No.1620
>>1619>dipper from gravity falls and wirt from over the garden wallI remember them, I liked them too! I also remember Dipper being shipped with Norman from paranorman kek.
I'm curious though, do you remember bad end friends? God, I loved them when I was younger. It was so much fun.
No.1624
>>1620That AU was so fun. How lucky we were to have these shows in our childhood.
No.1627
I don't take them seriously, but they're funny to look at once in a while. I remember Preller (from Hannibal) was a fun crack ship because it contrasted well with the main ship Hannigram which usually had a dark and serious tone. But if canon is generally ~quirky~ then crack ships kinda lose their magic, imo.
No.1737
>>1733>>1732doesn't this count as selfcest though ?
No.1738
>>1737Not really. RK900 and Connor are two different models.
No.1740
>>1732I think it's fucking stupid and barely above shipping OCs, but I respect the amount of work that goes into shit like the fan movie.
No.1741
>>1740I also really dislike the ship too. Especially when the people who ship it hate on HankCon bc "omg they're just friends!!!" like stfu
No.1930
>>1732That ship is example of the "migratory slash fandom" phenomenon. It's that specific dynamic (not always exactly the same) that shippers like and if they can't find it in a popular canon, they tend to invent it. I enjoy these ships (Kylux, Hawkey/Coulson etc) occasionally but they have kinda ultra-generic feel where you can switch the character names and everything stays the same. Tbh most fic is like that.
No.1957
>>1930Ooh, I've been looking for a name for this type of shipping. The type where shippers are more interested in the archetypes fulfilled than the actual characters themselves.
If I'm going to be honest it bothers me when they take minor characters I like and reduce them to a single trait, but of its something like Kylux where one part isn't even properly explored in canon I don't mind.
No.1972
>>1930>"migratory slash fandom" phenomenonI'm glad somebody put it into words. I dislike it for very selfish reasons: historically it serves as a death sentence for the stuff I want to look at from an artist/writer who gets into it.
Out of curiosity I went to go check the Hux/Ben tag on Ao3 just now and the number made me really butthurt lmao (FIFTEEN FUCKIN THOUSAND???)
No.1979
>>1978Just means they shift gears from ships I like to ships I don't have the right brainworms to enjoy. Usually I will at least develop a secondary interest in a person's new fandom work but I bounce off of "migratory slash fandom" stuff very hard. This happened with Oncecest back in the day now that I think about it.
Anyway a crackship I thought was super cute was Johnny Bravo/Samurai Jack.